Re: libxml v1 dependencies (was: Re: multilib fun - devel packages)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 02:48 -0800, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Christopher Blizzard wrote:
> 
> +100
> 
> Letting KDE enthusiastics package it the way they think it should be done 
> in Extras instead of having them whining about "RH shipping broken KDE" 
> is probably going to gain more friends than you lose by dropping it out of 
> Core.

It's just something that needs to be handled pretty carefully.  Don't
want to see the story "Red Hat drops support for KDE" (we haven't really
supported it for a long time anyway) but more "enables community around
KDE" because that's the real goal.  Also don't want to see the confusion
of Fedora/Red Hat here.  It's likely that we will include KDE for a long
time in our Red Hat releases even though it comes from Extras.

--Chris


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux