Re: no mandatory QA testing at all [Re: crazy thought about how to ease QA testing]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi


Other distros do have better QA, as Red Hat itself says about FCx.
RHEL has, per Red Hat, better QA than FC.



Comparing a commercial product to a community project is unfair. Lets hear about QA processes documented in other community projects.


Eh? My comment, as I asserted again, was about all Linux distros.
None of them has adequate QA

This is not a discussion about personal opinions on QA policies within all distributions including commercial ones. Only about whether Fedora legacy can improve itself to match a better policy within the community distributions.

. But I know of nobody who has proposed
to move software automatically from a test state to a release state
merely based on time elapsed except for FC and FCL.

Feel free to point to Fedora legacy a better documented policy within the community distributions or better yet contribute towards improving it. The time spend in discussions on the list could be directed towards actual work.

--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux