Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Marc Deslauriers wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 14:44 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
Since Legacy is no longer in my yum configuration, it's no longer
an issue for me, good or bad. I don't wish to subscribe to "testing".
Since "testing" and "release" have been merged, I have unsubscribed
from "release". If the security notices on FC2 get severe enough,
I'll just move on to CentOs, Scientific Linux, or Debian. Since
I'm already helping administer a Debian box, it might make sense
to move to that.
Just out of curiosity, what are the Debian, CentOS and Scientific Linux
QA procedures? Maybe Fedora Legacy could use some of them to get FL
releases up to their standards. They do have documented QA procedures,
right?
You think?. I am not so sure they are well documented at all and Debian
says on http://qa.debian.org/ "We know that, at the moment, there is no
real quality assurance for Debian, in a conventional meaning of that
term". Feel free to look for better QA processes than Fedora legacy
within the community distributions and suggest ideas.
Yes, my indictment earlier was for *all* distributions of Linux.
But Legacy has gone further than I can follow along, that's all.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
