Mike McCarty wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Yes, my indictment earlier was for *all* distributions of Linux.
But Legacy has gone further than I can follow along, that's all.
We are merely discussing a proposal so legacy process hasnt gone further
That is not my understanding.
at all. You also state that other distributions QA process is better.
Other distros do have better QA, as Red Hat itself says about FCx.
RHEL has, per Red Hat, better QA than FC.
Comparing a commercial product to a community project is unfair. Lets
hear about QA processes documented in other community projects.
How do we know?. If they are better are you willing to get involved in
Well, I guess that Red Hat could be mistaken or misleading about
its own products and projects, but I doubt that.
See above.
QA with the legacy project to help it be better?. Thats what we
need. More contributors working on it. Other discussions is just fluff.
No, I am not.
I sent out an e-mail some weeks ago suggesting that if
there were an easy way for me to test without endangering the stability
of my system, then I'd be willing to do some QA testing. The silence
in response to that message was completely deafening. It got not
even one reply. I saw recently some things about using VmWare perhaps
allowing one to do testing in a protected environment, but no one
really seems interested in following up on that.
So, while there is no backout procedure for the testing packages,
I am unwilling to do any testing.
See the other mails regarding this.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
