On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 13:06 -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 12:02 -0600, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > > > > But FL does need to have the same *quality*. Quality doesn't come > > > easily, and it's not something that should be taken lightly. At > the end > > > of the day I just want to contribute to a project that produces > > > something of quality, time and time again. > > > > And it does, > > But wait, Jesse just said in a different email that it doesn't. Which > is it? WHERE IS IT DOCUMENTED?!?!?!?! I guess it depends on what your definition of 'quality' is. The 'quality' of work we produce currently is satisfactory (or nearly so) for a majority of people. It isn't however for you. So, we're not producing YOUR quality, but we are producing other people's quality. Is that clear enough? -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
