On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 09:41 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > I'll state it again, loud and clear. Fedora Legacy is NOT an > alternative to Red Hat Enterprise Linux. It does not have the same > goal, it does not have the same features, it does not have the same > responsibility. PERIOD. But FL does need to have the same *quality*. Quality doesn't come easily, and it's not something that should be taken lightly. At the end of the day I just want to contribute to a project that produces something of quality, time and time again. Currently the complex puzzle, that FL calls a release, makes it difficult for FL to grow, in fact I think it is driving people away. Do you want people to depend on FL or do you want them to participate only to the point that they become convinced that paying RH or others is a much better course. -Jim P. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
