On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 12:24 -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote: > Redhat EL has achieved EAL2 and COE certifications. I seriously doubt > they did this using the same Q&A procedures that FL is using. Wrt to > COE and EAL, there is no such developer statements like "wouldn't that > be nice" or "warm and fuzzy feeling". EAL and COE necessitate > exacting > procedures and processes, something RH seems to be excelling at. Hey look, are we Red Hat Enterprise? No. Do we compete with Red Hat Enterprise? No. Do we WANT to compete with Red Hat Enterprise? No. Please do NOT make that assumption. > Add ISO 9001 into the discussion and your above description of RH Q&A > either reveals fraud within RH (wrt ISO 9001 compliance) or insight > into > your lack of knowledge of RH operations. RH QA processes for Enterprise products are NOT the same for Fedora products. Given that Fedora Legacy is about, um, lets see... FEDORA, my statements are in fact true. I'll state it again, loud and clear. Fedora Legacy is NOT an alternative to Red Hat Enterprise Linux. It does not have the same goal, it does not have the same features, it does not have the same responsibility. PERIOD. If you require the features and goals of Red Hat Enterprise, please USE Red Hat Enterprise, or one of it's rebuild projects such as CentOS by the cAos group. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
