Re: [FLSA-2005:2336] Updated kernel packages fix security issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 12:47 -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> That's not quite the reason i asked, but I already am subscribed to
> both.  

Ok.

> The reason for asking is to better understand why BugTRAQ waited,
> usually they do this pending some other data/info/contact for
> verification/advanced-notification/etc.  I am (unfortunately)
> intimately
> familiar with *TRAQ processes, delays, paper-work, proceedures.

Sure.

> I guess I could be more specific:  The reason I ask this is due to the
> website being down a few weeks ago and nobody sent out anything to the
> mailinglist during the days the outage was discussed on the
> mailinglist.

I can't grok this very well... what are you saying here?

> It took user interaction, with external folks (Verio, Vidyut, etc)

What user interaction?  Vidyut is the DNS provider, Verio is the
registrar, etc?

> before anything was learned.  Was BugTRAQ waiting on anyone at FL
> prior
> to releasing the notice to the wild?

Not that I'm aware of.  I was never contacted by them.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
 
Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux