On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 12:24 -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote: > Redhat EL has achieved EAL2 and COE certifications. I seriously doubt > they did this using the same Q&A procedures that FL is using. Wrt to > COE and EAL, there is no such developer statements like "wouldn't that > be nice" or "warm and fuzzy feeling". EAL and COE necessitate exacting > procedures and processes, something RH seems to be excelling at. That's why you should be buying Red Hat EL if you require the amount of Q&A procedures you think they have in place. > Add ISO 9001 into the discussion and your above description of RH Q&A > either reveals fraud within RH (wrt ISO 9001 compliance) or insight into > your lack of knowledge of RH operations. Is RH actually ISO 9001? Marc.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
