On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 08:29 -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote: > and I probably will continue at some level. The problem is FL needs > more than just the current people and process, and what it being tested > needs more rigorous (think: ISO 9001) guidelines and procedures. > I think if more rigorous guidelines and procedures are what you're looking for, clearly FL is not adequate for your needs and you should be looking elsewhere. > As I said; It is NOT anything close to simple, and even then it is open > to too much discernment. A *kernel* has been released recently..who > tested it in it's entirety? Where is the list of fixes and the > checkmarks that indicate "x" was fixed by Bob and "x" was tested by Sue? Who tests the kernels that come out of kernel.org? Who tests Debian's kernels? This is a community effort, if you want more extensive testing, you'll have to do it yourself using your own set of guidelines and procedures. Marc.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
