On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 12:46 -0500, Marc Deslauriers wrote: > I think if more rigorous guidelines and procedures are what you're > looking for, clearly FL is not adequate for your needs and you should be > looking elsewhere. Is that the image/statement that FL really truly believes in? If so, put it up on the main page of the website. > Who tests the kernels that come out of kernel.org? kernel.org is source code that *may* make it into a distro. > Who tests Debian's kernels? A pretty well organized community. Debian.org lists who does what, and who is responsible for what. There is clearly a defined and easily identifiable process there. > This is a community effort, No it's not. It's what 4 people, maybe 5 that really do stuff? Shouldn't there be more? If there is to be more, there needs to be more structure and a better documented process, along with accountability. > if you want more extensive testing, you'll have to do it yourself > using your own set of guidelines and procedures. Put that on the main website too. -Jim P. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
