Am 12.08.2016 um 11:49 schrieb Timothy Murphy:
Gerald B. Cox wrote:BTW, as I stated previously - my browser preference is Chrome because I'm a heavy user of all things Google - but if I were voting on the default browser for the KDE spin... I would not choose Chromium. I don't believe it advances what should be our core principles.Presumably you want someone to use the default browser. If so, you are recommending an app that you do not use yourself.
that's not the point
I imagine if QupZilla is chosen as default, 90% of Fedora/KDE users will change it every time a new version of Fedora comes out.
imagine != factfrankly for most users it don't matter at all which browser is installed by default because they use anything which opens a webpage and the ones who care about a specific one are not all using Firefox
look at all the Windows users which used MSIE all the years while it was the worst browser out there - they just didn't care as long it rendered websites
Personally I don't care what browser is chosen as default. But it disturbs me when somebody acts in a way that appears to me to be contrary to common sense. Is there any other example of this in KDE? I guess KMail might be an example
you can bring *any* QT/KDE application where a alternate one exists and all of them have users, otherwise they won't exist over the long
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
