On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:13:13 -0400 Striker Leggette <striker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/16/2016 12:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Well, yes, but (aside from the Orig poster) everyone else is basing > > their information on things that happened many years ago. > > It's still happening, just FYI: > > [Thursday, September 15, 2016] [11:16:26 AM EDT] > <Southern_Gentlem> Groan, as always your lack of being responsible > comes back to you eventually you can keep this on that you lock > yourself out of the box [Thursday, September 15, 2016] [11:17:00 AM > EDT] <Southern_Gentlem> we cant fix stupid IMHO that is taken out of context. He was talking to a user who had some particular/interesting security cases that didn't make much sense. They were talking about a hypothetical user in one of those cases, not the person he was talking to. At least thats the way I read it... but I guess I will stop trying to defend anyone and let them do it themselves. > I think we need to realize that this happens all the time and not > just 3+ years ago or during isolated incidents like the one that > prompted this thread. While OPs themselves might simply find these > types of statements to simply be informative or to "point the user in > the right direction", collectively, the statements are abrasive. > > Not having any Fedora IRC SIG tickets open for negative feedback does > not mean that the negative treatment is not happening. Sure, but I disagree that it's as bad as people make out... Anyhow, the council is of course free to redo anything they like. I do hope they will make sure they have sufficient people available if they decide to take over / replace the existing group. kevin
Attachment:
pgpogcizwkV6z.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
