On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 08:34:37AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> Speaking for the Server WG, we found that just allowing people to >> carry on until they feel like they're not willing to do it any more >> was a reasonable balance. We have had some turnover at times and it's >> been pretty smooth. >> >> Once someone steps down, we seek out replacements and then vote >> majority (but seeking consensus) for who will fill their seat. > > Yeah, I think so too — I think this works better than elections for an > actual functioning working group. We have elections for the guidance > and oversight groups (FESCo and two full-vote council seats.) Whatever the process, just let commops know when you want to publicize the nominations/results on commblog :) --RemyD. -- Remy DeCausemaker Fedora Community Lead & Council <decause@xxxxxxxxxx> https://whatcanidoforfedora.org _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
