We approved https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/Fedora_Modularization,_Prototype_Phase which means that "Modules Working Group" is now a Thing. I went back to look at how we formed the existing working groups in the first place, and it turns out the process started with me sending this message: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-September/001242.html I suggest that we start with the same process now -- I'll send out a similar message and people can self-nominate. We can follow the same one month timeframe, for formalization (while Langdon does his Grand Tour), but of course that needn't stop interested people getting started sooner. Previously, the members were selected by FESCo from the list of nominees. I suggest this time we have Langdon as Objective Lead do that selection submit that to the Council for approval (which will include FESCo voice through Josh as the Engineering lead, if necessary). Also, now is the time to nail down any bikeshed painting anyone has on Modules WG vs Modularity WG vs Modularization WG. (Modularizing WG? Modulatory WG? Modulating WG? Okay time for some coffee.) -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.