On 03/15/2016 08:13 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Matthew Miller > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:47:08AM +0000, White, Langdon wrote: >>> Was that initial members? Then voting took place after that? >> >> Yeah, then each group came up with their own charter and rules for >> replacing members. Only Env & Stacks went for full open elections for >> replacement, FWIW. > > Looks like lot of fun for the one who will organize these elections :-) > Speaking for the Server WG, we found that just allowing people to carry on until they feel like they're not willing to do it any more was a reasonable balance. We have had some turnover at times and it's been pretty smooth. Once someone steps down, we seek out replacements and then vote majority (but seeking consensus) for who will fill their seat.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
