On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 08:34:37AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Speaking for the Server WG, we found that just allowing people to > carry on until they feel like they're not willing to do it any more > was a reasonable balance. We have had some turnover at times and it's > been pretty smooth. > > Once someone steps down, we seek out replacements and then vote > majority (but seeking consensus) for who will fill their seat. Yeah, I think so too — I think this works better than elections for an actual functioning working group. We have elections for the guidance and oversight groups (FESCo and two full-vote council seats.) -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
