Re: forming the Modules WG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:47:08AM +0000, White, Langdon wrote:
> Was that initial members? Then voting took place after that?

Yeah, then each group came up with their own charter and rules for
replacing members. Only Env & Stacks went for full open elections for
replacement, FWIW.

> > Also, now is the time to nail down any bikeshed painting anyone has on
> > Modules WG vs Modularity WG vs Modularization WG. (Modularizing WG?
> > Modulatory WG? Modulating WG? Okay time for some coffee.)
> Oscillating WG?
> Seriously though, my preference is for Modularity WG, but I haven't got any
> paint.

*hands you some paint*

Quick, change the wiki pages before anyone notices.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list
council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and
open source software and content as a collaborative community.




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux