On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/19/2015 09:11 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> > And that's the main reason why as an actual FAmSCo member I'm strongly >>> > suggesting to keep elections as planned by our rules. And yes, let's add to >>> > the main responsibilities of the new elected members, they have to play an >>> > *active* role in making FOSCo happen ASAP, working together with the Council >>> > or CommOps to sync out the necessary tasks. >>> > Does this sound more reasonable for you? >> Sounds fantastic to me! > > Does this mean you're onboard with FAmSCo elections with the proviso > that they should be actively working to make FOSCo happen? Yes. > Was anybody else -1 on FAmSCo elections? Not that I had seen. And to be clear, I was never -1 for FAmSCo elections either. I was/am just very concerned that the thing that is supposed to be replacing FAmSCo isn't making actual progress. josh _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
