On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:08:46PM +0100, Robert Mayr wrote: > And that's the main reason why as an actual FAmSCo member I'm strongly > suggesting to keep elections as planned by our rules. And yes, let's add to > the main responsibilities of the new elected members, they have to play an > *active* role in making FOSCo happen ASAP, working together with the > Council or CommOps to sync out the necessary tasks. > Does this sound more reasonable for you? Just to reiterate from when I helped (?) start all this mess, I want to see several things: * Ambassadors — and therefore FAmSco — is very focused on traditional Linux events and on Linux User Groups. We need to expand beyond that. * Connect Ambassadors more closely to marketing, design, translation, docs, and etc. * Have somewhere that's a natural home — as well as governance and leadership — for the parts of the project that are outside of FESCo/Engineering. I orginally called this "outreach" (as I was thinking of these activities as largely facing out into the world), but I take Remy's point that this has a bad collision with "outreach" as used specifically about diversity. So if anyone has a better word, I'd love to hear it. Fedora Non-Engineering Steering Committee? :) -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
