2015-11-19 14:52 GMT+01:00 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Josh, as always you get the point :)[snip]
But all of this aside, FOSCo needs to happen extremely soon or it
needs to go back to the drawing board. It's planned existence without
actual existence is causing confusion and actually causing more
problems.
josh
_______________________________________________
The main problem is:
* Actual FAmSCo members are serving the commitee since June 2013, and although you're saying the interim activity is ongoing well, that's unfortunately not happening (and I feel responsible for that)
* FOSCo elections would be much better, but it's a body which should have started a year ago. Do you have a plan to make FOSCo happen within the next weeks? If yes I'd say YAY!!! Probably nobody can say for sure when we are able to put FOSCo in place, define exact responsibilities, involve all the teams and write correct Wiki pages and election terms for it.
And that's the main reason why as an actual FAmSCo member I'm strongly suggesting to keep elections as planned by our rules. And yes, let's add to the main responsibilities of the new elected members, they have to play an *active* role in making FOSCo happen ASAP, working together with the Council or CommOps to sync out the necessary tasks.
Does this sound more reasonable for you?
--
Robert Mayr
(robyduck)
(robyduck)
_______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
