On 11/19/2015 09:11 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> > And that's the main reason why as an actual FAmSCo member I'm strongly >> > suggesting to keep elections as planned by our rules. And yes, let's add to >> > the main responsibilities of the new elected members, they have to play an >> > *active* role in making FOSCo happen ASAP, working together with the Council >> > or CommOps to sync out the necessary tasks. >> > Does this sound more reasonable for you? > Sounds fantastic to me! Does this mean you're onboard with FAmSCo elections with the proviso that they should be actively working to make FOSCo happen? Was anybody else -1 on FAmSCo elections? Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
