On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 11:01 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 11:55:28 -0400, > Chris Tyler <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 11:31 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > > > - a FAS account aging requirement for posting rights (maybe a separate > > > planet that, if you hae a mentor, they can watch and you can graduate > > > from? For example new ambassadors could be added to an ambassadors > > > planet first..... if there is some faux paus people reading will better > > > know who the poster is and more easily know how to contact them etc) > > > > I'm curious about this one, because CLA+1 strikes me as being better > > than an aging requirement. In what cases are new contribs getting +1 > > without some form of mentorship or input from the community? > > That was the only one on the list that didn't seem to be clearly a good > idea. I think this issue is better solved by having better documentation > on how to use (particularly using tagging) and what the expectations are > for Fedora Planet. > > I think restricting people to a limited feed during a probationary period > is more likely to do harm by discouraging people, than prevent harm by > preventing oopses. Actually I've spoken to several people who've remarked they wish they had the guts to blog on planet and I've encouraged several of them to give it a shot, sometimes reading over their blog posts before they made them public. There are actually many people (mostly non-developers :) )who are afraid to post directly to planet but for whom some sort of sandbox-like place to post in a less 'public' way might help build up their confidence..... ~m _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
