On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 11:01:16AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 11:55:28 -0400, > Chris Tyler <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 11:31 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > > > - a FAS account aging requirement for posting rights (maybe a separate > > > planet that, if you hae a mentor, they can watch and you can graduate > > > from? For example new ambassadors could be added to an ambassadors > > > planet first..... if there is some faux paus people reading will better > > > know who the poster is and more easily know how to contact them etc) > > > > I'm curious about this one, because CLA+1 strikes me as being better > > than an aging requirement. In what cases are new contribs getting +1 > > without some form of mentorship or input from the community? > > That was the only one on the list that didn't seem to be clearly a good > idea. I think this issue is better solved by having better documentation > on how to use (particularly using tagging) and what the expectations are > for Fedora Planet. > > I think restricting people to a limited feed during a probationary period > is more likely to do harm by discouraging people, than prevent harm by > preventing oopses. There are some guidelines on our Planet page on the wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Planet I pointed these out in another post as well. I'm curious to know if the sysadmins/web team has had to consult these since the FUDCon in Toronto, after which event they were written and approved. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
