On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 11:55:28 -0400, Chris Tyler <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 11:31 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > > - a FAS account aging requirement for posting rights (maybe a separate > > planet that, if you hae a mentor, they can watch and you can graduate > > from? For example new ambassadors could be added to an ambassadors > > planet first..... if there is some faux paus people reading will better > > know who the poster is and more easily know how to contact them etc) > > I'm curious about this one, because CLA+1 strikes me as being better > than an aging requirement. In what cases are new contribs getting +1 > without some form of mentorship or input from the community? That was the only one on the list that didn't seem to be clearly a good idea. I think this issue is better solved by having better documentation on how to use (particularly using tagging) and what the expectations are for Fedora Planet. I think restricting people to a limited feed during a probationary period is more likely to do harm by discouraging people, than prevent harm by preventing oopses. _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
