On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 03:20:25AM -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-February/msg00174.html > > This came up somewhere else today and I thought it was a good read. > Someone pointed this out to me a year back and I found this bit interesting: "" If you guys want a specific productive suggestion, I think these are two de facto directions that could just be adopted; one is a kind of building block platform shared among the GNOME desktop, Maemo, GPE, XFCE even [2]; it might benefit from becoming explicitly targeted toward multiple projects? Emphasize fd.org more. I don't know. Two is a GNOME desktop that is still largely UNIX/shell-user/developer-oriented, designed for the customers of today's Linux distributions. Focus on this more and do it better. """ I think Fedora has the same basic choices for easy directions to pursue. Focus on being easily adapted into Sugar for OLPC, Meego for netbooks and handsets, RHEL for servers, appliances, developer spins, lab images, etc. or Focus on being a great distribution for the unix admins, developers, and packagers that are the core of our contributors. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpC7yI3oojYe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
