On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:59:55 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > I dont have a problem with that. Then I think we are in violent agreement :-) > What I find poor practice is going > through a committee /<insert your governing body> before doing routine > things. Good governance on a distributed project in general is all > about enabling and facilitating contributors to do what they want > instead of centralizing all decisions. yes > Notifications are easy to do in a > asynchronous fashion. That's fine. exactly > Moving decisions to a committee is > not. It is very much dangerous to a project to encourage that. I'd say it depends on the kind of decisions that need to be taken... > Every > time we treat processes more important than the individual contributors > involved we are going to end up damaging ourselves. I'd tend to agree to that too. Cheers, C _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
