On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 05:07 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 15:00 -0400, Christopher Blizzard wrote: > > > 3. Process and democracy are not a replacement for strong leadership. > "process and democracy" are means to establish "an accepted leadership"! > > I.e. a "strong leadership" will only work, if it is "accepted by the > anonymous masses". This where I feel Fedora leadership has always had > and still has deficits. Could you provide examples of this where more than just one or two vocal people opposed something and it was done anyway? I cannot recall such a time, but if there is one it would be important to use as an example to learn from. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
