On 22.03.2007 10:27, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 22.03.2007 09:30, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > [...] >>> I dont think go to >>> FESCo is the right answer here at all. >> I strongly think it would have been. > Since you are no longer in FESCo the right thing to do is to make sure > FESCo shares that opinion and define its scope to include managing web > content. I will then stay off the web pages and FESCo can be micro > managing that. [...] Well, I wrote a private mail to some Fedora and FESCo people members some days ago on this particular issue and received some replies. So I know that I'm not alone with opinion. But it's up to those people to speak up here -- I'm not going to forward private mails to a public list. CU thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
