On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Why not send that signal through an open election?
I think that's not enough for now as we did quite bad with setting the
sign "we seriously want the community involved in Fedora" in the past years.
Then, imho, we've got the same problem in reverse. Saying that "50% of
the F-star board is guaranteed to be non-RH" is every bit as bad as saying
that "50% of the F-star board is guaranteed to be RH."
The people who do the work of building packages for Fedora decide what the
governance of F-star is. Full stop.
We shouldn't try to address problems of perception by making arbitrary
decisions in the present. We should decide what is right, and do it.
--g
-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
