On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Mike McGrath wrote:
Stuff like this becomes less of a worry if we focus on SIG's for
various software packages/groups instead of a large all encompassing
body. Groups like KDE, Gnome, java, PHP, etc could get their own
SIG's and own repos. I'm not saying we should do this, but I do think
we should look at doing it.
Yeah, I think there's a lot of merit in this approach.
The job of F-star should be to make sure that packages in Fedora are built
properly, work together, and are properly maintained. This includes
"release management" of F-star in its entirety, IMHO.
The management of various "distros" that are derived from F-star should be
individual Projects or SIGs. Fedora Desktop would be a Project. Fedora
Games would be a SIG. Sounds good to me.
--g
-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
