Re: FESCo future

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Greg Dekoenigsberg schrieb:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> But we IMHO need it for now to really set a sign to the public: "We
>> seriously want the community involved in Fedora. Thus to show our trust
>> to the community we added this rule to make sure that they wil have
>> certain influence in the central board that in the future will govern
>> what was known as Fedora Core until now".
> Why not send that signal through an open election?

I think that's not enough for now as we did quite bad with setting the
sign "we seriously want the community involved in Fedora" in the past years.

CU
thl

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux