Re: FESCo future

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Greg Dekoenigsberg schrieb:
> My $0.02 on the structure of the F-star board:
> 
> No mandate of RH/non-RH seats.  At all.  Pure meritocracy. [...]

Honestly I'd like to agree. I even think we can and should get rid of
the proposed mandate or RH/non-RH seats in the future (two or three
years from now mabye?).

But we IMHO need it for now to really set a sign to the public: "We
seriously want the community involved in Fedora. Thus to show our trust
to the community we added this rule to make sure that they wil have
certain influence in the central board that in the future will govern
what was known as Fedora Core until now".

CU
Thorsten Honestly Leemhuis -- thl ;-)

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux