Thorsten Leemhuis (fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > I understood it like this until now: > > - Core Packages move over to Extras To the current Extras infrastructure, yes. I'm not sure if 'moved to Extras' is the right phrasing, given the below. (For example, the /pub/linux/extras dir will eventually become read-only, etc.) > - Extras is renamed to something more generic -- let's name it "Fedora > Package Collection (FPC)" here for now Probably not that. :) > - FESCo will govern over all the packages and the rules around them; > will likely get a new name, too; maybe new members Right. > - no Core, thus no Core cabal then; some/all people from it maybe get > integrated into FESCo There will almost certianly be a release team that will include some, if not all, of the same members. This could be responsible to FESCo, but I don't think all things (freeze schedules, package manifests, etc.) need to be pushed up to F*Sco directly. Of course, that's mostly what you said. For example, if we produce a Desktop spin, there would be a Desktop SIG more or less responsible for deciding what apps go in it, what's default, etc. Similarly for a Server spin. And there would be a release team responsible for them, consisting of (but not limited to) testing, rel-eng, etc. Bill _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
