seth vidal schrieb: > On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 15:52 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> Hmm, all I wanted to avoid is that more than 50% of the members are from >> Red Hat as a lot of people won't like that. > Let's make sure that there is a mention that if a non-rh member takes a > job at rh that they don't lose their seat immediately. Only at the next > set of elections will their present employment be taken into account. > > does that reasonable? Hmm, that okay for me, but I suspect some people won't like it. I had something like the next para in my first local draft, but I threw it out before sending it to the list as I thought "not important enough" ;-) An additional non-rh member is appointed if a non-rh member gets a job at rh and due to that less than 50% of the seats would be filled by non-rh members. CU thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
