On 11/27/06, Greg Dekoenigsberg <gdk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> But we IMHO need it for now to really set a sign to the public: "We
> seriously want the community involved in Fedora. Thus to show our trust
> to the community we added this rule to make sure that they wil have
> certain influence in the central board that in the future will govern
> what was known as Fedora Core until now".
Why not send that signal through an open election?
--g
Stuff like this becomes less of a worry if we focus on SIG's for
various software packages/groups instead of a large all encompassing
body. Groups like KDE, Gnome, java, PHP, etc could get their own
SIG's and own repos. I'm not saying we should do this, but I do think
we should look at doing it.
-Mike
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
