On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 10:03 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > I have to say i'm very against the no more than 50% Red Hat employees > guideline. We are all the Fedora Community. Whoever steps and and gets > voted in by the community should do the job. if the community votes against > someone because of their employment so be it. no seats should be > automatically filled by RH people. All seats should be 100% community voted > upon. If in the event any person does not do their job of is not meeting > the needs of the community then the board or the rest of the committee needs > to censure them. along with some guidelines that if it continues you will > be replaced. So if a Red Hat employee is being a continual problem and is > taking a Red Hat needs this so we must do it approach they get censured by > the committee, the board, their manager. I sure would not want a meeting > with my manager if i were a Red Hat employee if i was kicked off or about to > be Kicked off the steering committee. I agree with Dennis here. I don't really think we need to be setting a maximum percent of members that can be employed at Red Hat, as long as the community is voting on who gets the seats. /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
