On 05/12/2014 10:15 AM, Masaru Nomiya wrote:
> Daniel Mack <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> has written:
>> Yes. If the quirk doesn't work for you, the device needs some other
>> workaround than the UD-H01.
>
> Is this not related?
>
> [...]
> if (unlikely(sender->udh01_fb_quirk)) {
It is related, but the code relies on the boolean variable
sender->udh01_fb_quirk which should be set for you device by the patch I
sent you. You could add this line inside this if-condition:
printk(KERN_ERR "%s():%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
After recompilation and reboot, the log should contain lots of messages
if the quirk was set.
> [...]
>
> But I can't get the feedback value.
What exactly do you mean by that? Which tests did you do in order to
find out?
Daniel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Alsa-user mailing list
Alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
