On 10/15/13 5:48 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 04:57:36PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> On 10/15/13 4:49 PM, Ben Myers wrote: >>> Hey, >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:31:10PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 04:22:14PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: >>>>> The tags are out there: >>>>> http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/cmds/xfsprogs.git;a=tags >>>> >>>> I managed to somehow miss them. Sorry! >>> >>> np >>> >>>>> That's an interesting idea. We hadn't discussed a 3.1.12 release. No >>>>> particular objection to doing that, it's just that we didn't branch for the >>>>> v3.0.5->v3.1.0 set of releases. Maybe it is better if we all focus on 3.2.0. >>>> >>>> With git you can easily branch from a past commit, e.g.: >>>> >>>> hch@brick:~/work/xfsprogs$ git checkout -b release-3.1 v3.1.11 >>>> Switched to a new branch 'release-3.1' >>> >>> Yep. If folks want a 3.1.12 we should certainly kick the idea around a bit. >>> I'm just guessing that most would prefer to focus on a 3.2.0 in the near term. >>> Maybe I'm mistaken about that though. ;) >> >> I'm not super keen to divide the focus; I've already updated the distros I >> care about to 3.2.0-alpha1, so I wouldn't go backwards to a 3.1.12. > > I'd prefer we focus on getting stuff reviewed and integrated into > 3.2.0 more quickly than we are now. At this point in the cycle, we > really need the 3.2 branch and xfstests to be updated daily with the > changes that were reviewed in the past 24 hours so that we can > iterate test cycles with the latest fixes more easily. Agreed, I'm sitting on things that I don't know if I need to resend or not. I've offered it before, and I'll offer again: if it's a burden for SGI to keep up with xfstests merging, we can help - but the delays are getting to be problematic again in the current process. Thanks, -Eric > This will give us a clearer idea of the problems we still need to > fix before the release can progress without everyone having to keep > their own private trees up to date with what everyone else is > changing/fixing... > > Cheers, > > Dave. > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
