On 10/15/13 4:49 PM, Ben Myers wrote: > Hey, > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:31:10PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 04:22:14PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: >>> The tags are out there: >>> http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/cmds/xfsprogs.git;a=tags >> >> I managed to somehow miss them. Sorry! > > np > >>> That's an interesting idea. We hadn't discussed a 3.1.12 release. No >>> particular objection to doing that, it's just that we didn't branch for the >>> v3.0.5->v3.1.0 set of releases. Maybe it is better if we all focus on 3.2.0. >> >> With git you can easily branch from a past commit, e.g.: >> >> hch@brick:~/work/xfsprogs$ git checkout -b release-3.1 v3.1.11 >> Switched to a new branch 'release-3.1' > > Yep. If folks want a 3.1.12 we should certainly kick the idea around a bit. > I'm just guessing that most would prefer to focus on a 3.2.0 in the near term. > Maybe I'm mistaken about that though. ;) I'm not super keen to divide the focus; I've already updated the distros I care about to 3.2.0-alpha1, so I wouldn't go backwards to a 3.1.12. hch, do you have a specific need for it? -Eric > Thanks, > Ben > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
