On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 04:57:36PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 10/15/13 4:49 PM, Ben Myers wrote: > > Hey, > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:31:10PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 04:22:14PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > >>> The tags are out there: > >>> http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/cmds/xfsprogs.git;a=tags > >> > >> I managed to somehow miss them. Sorry! > > > > np > > > >>> That's an interesting idea. We hadn't discussed a 3.1.12 release. No > >>> particular objection to doing that, it's just that we didn't branch for the > >>> v3.0.5->v3.1.0 set of releases. Maybe it is better if we all focus on 3.2.0. > >> > >> With git you can easily branch from a past commit, e.g.: > >> > >> hch@brick:~/work/xfsprogs$ git checkout -b release-3.1 v3.1.11 > >> Switched to a new branch 'release-3.1' > > > > Yep. If folks want a 3.1.12 we should certainly kick the idea around a bit. > > I'm just guessing that most would prefer to focus on a 3.2.0 in the near term. > > Maybe I'm mistaken about that though. ;) > > I'm not super keen to divide the focus; I've already updated the distros I > care about to 3.2.0-alpha1, so I wouldn't go backwards to a 3.1.12. I'd prefer we focus on getting stuff reviewed and integrated into 3.2.0 more quickly than we are now. At this point in the cycle, we really need the 3.2 branch and xfstests to be updated daily with the changes that were reviewed in the past 24 hours so that we can iterate test cycles with the latest fixes more easily. This will give us a clearer idea of the problems we still need to fix before the release can progress without everyone having to keep their own private trees up to date with what everyone else is changing/fixing... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
