Re: Why are we still using trn?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 09:27:55PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 11:48:39AM -0800, Booker Bense wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Lars J. Aas wrote:
> > > Moving files with cvs causes you to lose their history unless you do it on
> > > the repository side.  If I could therefore get a tarball of the repository
> > > files and work on that instead of on a cvs checkout, I would be a lot more
> > > motivated to do the work, and I could set it up separately at
> > > for those who want to see/comment on the progress.  It would just be a fork
> > > until the trn-developers agreed that the new setup was complete and superior
> > > to the existing one and then move/migrate it back...
> It's very easy if you've already got CVS access, which I do. Lars, drop
> me a mail and I'll send you the tarball.

That said, moving a new repository *back* to SourceForge might be more
difficult. I'd suggest talking to Wayne before embarking on anything
serious ... I doubt he would be averse to people doing long-needed work
of this nature.

Colin Watson                                  []

This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!

[Index of Archives]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Epson Inkjet]     [Mhonarc]     [Nntpcache]

  Powered by Linux