Re: Why are we still using trn?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 11:48:39AM -0800, Booker Bense wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Lars J. Aas wrote:
> 
> > Booker Bense <bbense@SLAC.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
> > : - Every now and then I'm tempted to switch to using GNUS mode in
> > : emacs, but I've got way to many trn commands hardwired in my
> > : hands. I hear good things about mutt if you want to go the combo
> > : news/mail route.
> >
> > Mutt does news?
> 
> _ No that's my mistake, I was confusing mutt and slrn, since they
> both use s-lang.

Actually, it does, but you need to use any of a number of unsupported
patches.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/    ***    I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/   ***   to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com

[Index of Archives]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Epson Inkjet]     [Mhonarc]     [Nntpcache]

  Powered by Linux