On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 naddy@mips.inka.de wrote: > David Sewell <dsewell@virginia.edu> wrote: > > > > I'd guess that among people who used text-based newsreaders in a *nix > > environment, slrn has >90% of the usage. > > The features I'm missing in trn are also mentioned on the slrn > wishlist... > > tin might actually support them now. I'll have to take a closer > look. Using tin used to be frowned upon, though. > - I think that's from when it faked threads in face of the lack of support on the server side for getting thread data. Servers have improved a lot since then and some clients have gotten much worse than tin ever was... - Booker C. Bense ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com
