Re: Why are we still using trn?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 wrote:

> David Sewell <> wrote:
> > I'd guess that among people who used text-based newsreaders in a *nix
> > environment, slrn has >90% of the usage.
> The features I'm missing in trn are also mentioned on the slrn
> wishlist...
> tin might actually support them now.  I'll have to take a closer
> look.  Using tin used to be frowned upon, though.

- I think that's from when it faked threads in face of the lack
of support on the server side for getting thread data. Servers
have improved a lot since then and some clients have gotten much
worse than tin ever was...

- Booker C. Bense

This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!

[Index of Archives]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Epson Inkjet]     [Mhonarc]     [Nntpcache]

  Powered by Linux