On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 05:30:39PM -0800, Mike Castle wrote: > In article <Pine.GSO.4.33.0203211055580.25939-100000@vax.hanford.org>, > Matt Ackeret <mattack@area.com> wrote: > >world examples. I may change my mind. I mean, I *used* to (argh, I > >guess this was 10 or more years ago) not even like the idea of > >threaded news, because so many people posted unrelated articles in > >the same thread, so just viewing by subject seemed useless.. (Yes, I > >purposely used "unrelated" again, and I know it does more than just > >by subject, but the subject is still part of the process, right?) > >Heck, now I even thread email, with pine. > > I don't think trn uses Subjects for threading, just the message-ids > and references (maybe in-reply-tos). trn will use In-Reply-To for threading as of 4.0-test75, yes. (There was some support added in 4.0-test59, but I don't think it was complete.) -- Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
