Re: Looking for a new version with AJAX etc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, November 29, 2012 03:01, Fredrik Jervfors wrote:
>>> I wonder why the design and the functions are so “old-school” like.
>>> It looks like Web 1.0 or before, but I miss some stylish new design
>>> with
>>> the use of AJAX and so on, like other webmailers using today.
>>>
>>> Is there any development going in this direction, which I missed since
>>> yet?
>>
>> I hope not. I am very happy there is still a webmailer left which
>> hasn't jumped on the 2.0/AJAX/active everything bandwagon.
>>
>>> Just to test, I installed the Webmailer “Roundcube” and this looks much
>>> newer to me.
>>>
>>> It is not just me, but also my customers, to who I want to offer a
>>> modern and nice looking webmailer for their websites.
>>
>> No one is stopping you from doing so. But please remember there
>> are other users who are, for various reasons ranging from simple force
>> of
>> habit to actual technical limitations, quite happy to stay with the "old
>> school" interface.
>>
>> Just install Roundcube and Squirrelmail side by side and let each
>> user use the one he or she likes best. Choice is good.  If Squirrelmail
>> converted to the same AJAX paradigm everyone else is using it would take
>> away that choice.
>
> The SquirrelMail approach is to detach the UI from the core functionality
> so it's possible to use SquirrelMail for offering both an AJAX 2.0 UI and
> a old-school HTML 4.01 UI side by side. We don't want to take that choice
> away from the system administrator and his/her customers. And you you want
> to have a custom-made UI you could provide it yourself as a plugin without
> having to patch SquirrelMail. The same goes for a mobile UI.
>
> But as I wrote earlier; we started but we haven't reached the goal yet
> since we have limited resources. If you know anyone who can help with
> graphics, layout, JavaScript please ask them to participate. Even if we go
> web 2.0 we won't leave web 1.0 behind.
>
> --
> Fredrik Jervfors <http://fredrik.jervfors.se/>
> The SquirrelMail Project
I concur that there needs to be a non-AJAX version.  I just had a client
who wanted us to add a download progress bar and I asked if he could
guarantee everyone had Javascript on and AJAX available and he said no he
couldn't and that's a small subset of our customer base.

Just my 2cents worth.

------
William R. Mussatto
Systems Engineer
http://www.csz.com
909-920-9154


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: 
VERIFY Test and improve your parallel project with help from experts 
and peers. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
-----
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines
List address: squirrelmail-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users



[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [gtk]     [KDE]     [Cyrus SASL]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]     [Webcams]

  Powered by Linux