Am 27.11.2012 09:28, schrieb francwalter@xxxxxxx: > I wonder why the design and the functions are so “old-school” like. > It looks like Web 1.0 or before, but I miss some stylish new design with the use of AJAX and so on, like other webmailers using today. > > Is there any development going in this direction, which I missed since yet? I hope not. I am very happy there is still a webmailer left which hasn't jumped on the 2.0/AJAX/active everything bandwagon. > Just to test, I installed the Webmailer “Roundcube” and this looks much newer to me. > > It is not just me, but also my customers, to who I want to offer a modern and nice looking webmailer for their websites. No one is stopping you from doing so. But please remember there are other users who are, for various reasons ranging from simple force of habit to actual technical limitations, quite happy to stay with the "old school" interface. Just install Roundcube and Squirrelmail side by side and let each user use the one he or she likes best. Choice is good. If Squirrelmail converted to the same AJAX paradigm everyone else is using it would take away that choice. -- Tilman Schmidt Phoenix Software GmbH Bonn, Germany
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: VERIFY Test and improve your parallel project with help from experts and peers. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
----- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines List address: squirrelmail-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
