Re: Unreserved portnumbers in corenetwork

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Why not just decouple the ports from the application by giving them names like port8080_t? This would allow multiple policies to be written to manage that resource, only one of which should be active at a time. I think the real issue is the assumption that only one application will own ports like 80, 8080, 443 and 8443.

joe

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux