Re: secadm/sysadm discussion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 16:22 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> <rant>
> 
> 
> Personally I think sysadm_t is a waste of time.  It is a poor mans
> unconfined_t and should be eliminated from the face of the earth.  All
> it does is generate Bugs and avc messages without supplying any real
> security.  It makes no sense, as a confinement of a root user since it
> is so easily gotten around.  If you have an administrator of a machine,
> that you want to confine, start with only allowing him the privs that
> are required to do his job.  You can't start by saying he can do
> everything except ABC.

As long as policy is used in a strict configuration, sysadm will be
needed.  I would prefer to tighten it up.

-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
(410) 290-1411 x150


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux