Le dimanche 30 juillet 2006 à 12:03 +1000, John Pye a écrit : > I could either > create a new (separate) RPM that just contains the older libgfortran, or > I could just include the file inside my package (and add a "Provides: > libgfortran" tag of some sort, perhaps). I was thinking that I would use > an %if statement inside my .spec file that would test which distro I was > building for (either using the 'dist' variable, or perhaps using "--with > bundled_gfortran") and depending on which one it was, either include > libgfortran in the RPM or not. Do that and a lot of people won't ever touch your packages with a 10-foot pole. Bundling unrelated libs in a package, especially because you can't figure how to build with the new distro-supplied version, is strongly frowned upon. (also the legal and maintenance side-effects are interesting) -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
_______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
